Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Senthil Kumar, A. R.
- Investigating the Performance of Snowmelt Runoff Model Using Temporally Varying Near-Surface Lapse Rate in Western Himalayas
Abstract Views :197 |
PDF Views:79
Authors
Affiliations
1 Inter Disciplinary Program (IDP) in Climate Studies and Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400 076, ID
2 Inter Disciplinary Program (IDP) in Climate Studies and Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400 076, IN
3 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400 076, IN
4 National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee 247 667, IN
1 Inter Disciplinary Program (IDP) in Climate Studies and Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400 076, ID
2 Inter Disciplinary Program (IDP) in Climate Studies and Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400 076, IN
3 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400 076, IN
4 National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee 247 667, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 114, No 04 (2018), Pagination: 808-813Abstract
The present study assesses the effect of accounting the temporal variation of near-surface lapse rate in the conceptual, degree-day snowmelt runoff model simulations in a cold-desert region of Himalayas. The nearsurface lapse rate over Spiti basin shows seasonal variation during a year. The results obtained show that the inclusion of monthly variation of lapse rate in the hydrological modelling is able to capture the observed hydrograph more efficiently than when an annually constant value of lapse rate is employed. Based on our results and considering the available data, a monthly representation of near-surface lapse rates in the temperature index based models is recommended for Himalayan basins.Keywords
Himalayas, Lapse Rate, Snowmelt Runoff Model, Temporal Variation.References
- Seidel, K. and Martinec, J., Remote Sensing in Snow Hydrology: Runoff Modelling, Effect of Climate Change, Berlin, Springer, 2004.
- Mankin, J. S., Viviroli, D., Singh, D., Hoekstra, A. Y. and Diffenbaugh, N. S., The potential for snow to supply human water demand in the present and future. Environ. Res. Lett., 2015, 10(11), 114016; http://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/114016.
- Shrestha, A. B., Agrawal, N. K., Alfthan, B., Bajracharya, S. R., Marechal, J. and van Oort, B., The Himalayan Climate and Water Atlas: Impact of climate change on water resources in five of Asia’s major river basins. ICIMOD, GRID-Arendal and CICERO, 2015.
- Azmat, M., Laio, F. and Poggi, D., Estimation of water resources availability and mini-hydro productivity in high-altitude scarcelygauged watershed. Water Resour. Manage., 2015, 29(14), 5037–5054; http://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1102-z.
- Kult, J., Choi, W. and Choi, J., Sensitivity of the snowmelt runoff model to snow covered area and temperature inputs. Appl. Geogr., 2014, 55, 30–38; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.08.011.
- Romshoo, A. S., Dar, R. A., Rashid, I., Marazi, A., Ali, N. and Sumira, N., Implications of shrinking cryosphere under changing climate on the streamflows in the lidder catchment in the upper Indus Basin, India. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res., 2015, 47(4), 627–644.
- Panday, P. K., Williams, C. A., Frey, K. E. and Brown, M. E., Application and evaluation of a snowmelt runoff model in the Tamor River basin, Eastern Himalaya using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) data assimilation approach. Hydrol. Process., 2014, 28(21), 5337–5353; http://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10005.
- Singh, P. and Jain, S. K., Modelling of streamflow and its components for a large Himalayan basin with predominant snowmelt yields. Hydrol. Sci. J., 2003, 48(2), 257–276; http://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.48.2.257.44693.
- Singh, P. and Bengtsson, L., Effect of warmer climate on the depletion of snow-covered area in the Satluj basin in the western Himalayan region. Hydrol. Sci. J., 2003, 48(3), 413–425.
- Martinec, J., Rango, A. and Roberts, R., Snowmelt Run-off Model (SRM) User’s Manual, College of Agriculture Home Econonic, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA, 2008.
- Marshall, S. J., Sharp, M. J., Burgess, D. O. and Anslow, F. S., Near-surface-temperature lapse rates on the Prince of Wales Ice-field, Ellesmere Island, Canada: implications for regional downscaling of temperature. Int. J. Climatol., 2007, 27(3), 385–398; http://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1396.
- Glickman, T. S., Glossary of Meteorology, American Meteorological Society, Boston, 2000.
- Gardner, A. S. et al., Near-surface temperature lapse rates over Arctic Glaciers and their implications for temperature downscaling. J. Climatol., 2009, 22(16), 4281–4298.
- Minder, J. R., Mote, P. W. and Lundquist, J. D., Surface temperature lapse rates over complex terrain: lessons from the Cascade Mountains. J. Geophys. Res. Atmosp., 2010, 115(14), 1–13; http://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013493.
- Blandford, T. R., Humes, K. S., Harshburger, B. J., Moore, B. C., Walden, V. P. and Ye, H., Seasonal and synoptic variations in near-surface air temperature lapse rates in a mountainous basin. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 2008, 47(1), 249–261; http://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAMC1565.1.
- Harlow, R. C., Burke, E. J., Scott, R. L., Shuttleworth, W. J., Brown, C. M. and Petti, J. R., Derivation of temperature lapse rates in semi-arid southeastern Arizona. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 2004, 8, 1179–1185.
- Seidel, D. J. and Free, M., Climatologies and trends at low and high elevation. Clim. Change, 2003, 59(1–2), 53–74.
- Li, X. G. and Williams, M. W., Snowmelt runoff modeling in an arid mountain watershed, Tarim Basin, China. Hydrol. Process., 2008, 22(19), 3931–3940; doi:10.1002/hyp.7098
- Richard, C. and Gratton, D. J., The importance of the air temperature variable for the snowmelt runoff modelling using the SRM. Hydrol. Process., 2001, 15(18), 3357–3370.
- Kattel, D. B., Yao, T., Yang, K., Tian, L., Yang, G. and Joswiak, D., Temperature lapse rate in complex mountain terrain on the southern slope of the central Himalayas. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 2013, 113(3–4), 671–682; http://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0816-6.
- Hall, D. K., Riggs, G. A. and Salomonson, V. V., Development of methods for mapping global snow cover using moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer data. Remote Sensing Environ., 1995, 54(2), 127–140.
- Hall, D. K. et al., MODIS snow-cover products. Remote Sensing Environ., 2002, 83(1–2), 181–194.
- Abudu, S., Sheng, Z., Cui, C., Saydi, M., Sabzi, H.-Z. and King, J. P., Integration of aspect and slope in snowmelt runoff modeling in a mountain watershed. Water Sci. Eng., 9, 265–273; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2016.07.002.
- Kumar, A. and Ramsankaran, RAAJ., Snowmelt Runoff Simulation for Spiti Watershed in Western Himalayas using Remote Sensing and GIS, Master’s Thesis report, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay, Mumbai, 2015.
- Singh, P., Kumar, N. and Arora, M., Degree-day factors for snow and ice for Dokriani Glacier, Garhwal Himalayas. J. Hydrol., 2000, 235(1–2), 1–11; http://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00249-3.
- A Hybrid-Wavelet Artificial Neural Network Model for Monthly Water Table Depth Prediction
Abstract Views :286 |
PDF Views:83
Authors
Anandakumar
1,
A. R. Senthil Kumar
2,
Ravindra Kale
3,
B. Maheshwara Babu
1,
U. Sathishkumar
1,
G. V. Srinivasa Reddy
1,
Prasad S. Kulkarni
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Soil and Water Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering, Raichur 584 104, IN
2 National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee 247 667, IN
3 Western Himalayan Regional Centre, National Institute of Hydrology, Jammu 180 003, IN
1 Department of Soil and Water Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering, Raichur 584 104, IN
2 National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee 247 667, IN
3 Western Himalayan Regional Centre, National Institute of Hydrology, Jammu 180 003, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 117, No 9 (2019), Pagination: 1475-1481Abstract
Groundwater is an essential natural resource in the country to fulfil the irrigation, domestic, industrial and other needs. In order to ensure sustainable use of groundwater resources, the groundwater level is used as an important indicator for balancing the groundwater withdrawal rate and replenishment rate through the recharge. Quantitatively, the recharge rate is governed by various complex large-scale hydrological processes and hence achievement of sustainability of groundwater supplies, through sustainable withdrawal rate is a complicated issue. In the present study, a data-driven prediction model by combining discrete wavelet transform (DWT) with artificial neural network (ANN) called as wavelet artificial neural network (WANN) is proposed for the groundwater table prediction. The simulation results obtained by regular ANN model were compared with those obtained by WANN model to prove the superiority of the latter model over the former. WANN model was developed using decomposed signals of rainfall, evapotranspiration and water table depth time series as inputs in the ANN model to arrive at a prediction of monthly fluctuation of the groundwater table. Rainfall time series was decomposed using Haar wavelet at third decomposition level and evapotranspiration and water table depth time series was decomposed using Daubechies wavelet at second decomposition level. The RMSE value of ANN and WANN model during validation were found to be 0.3648 m and 0.1695 m respectively, which showed decrease in RMSE value by 0.195 m when WANN was applied. Model efficiencies of ANN and WANN model during validation were 84.65% and 95.68%, indicating excellent improvement of model accuracy after applying WANN. Hence, the proposed WANN model seems to be a promising tool to predict the monthly water table fluctuation.Keywords
Artificial Neural Network, Wavelet Transformation, Wavelet Artificial Neural Network, Water Table Depth Prediction.References
- French, M. N., Krajewski, W. F. and Cuykendall, R. R., Rainfall forecasting in space and time using a neural network. J. Hydrol., 1992, 137, 1–31.
- Nayak, P. C., Satyaji Rao, Y. R. and Sudheer, K. P., Groundwater level forecasting in a shallow aquifer using artificial neural network approach. Water Resour. Manage., 2006, 20, 77–90.
- Krishna, B., Satyaji Rao, Y. R. and Vijaya, T., Modelling groundwater levels in an urban coastal aquifer using artificial neural networks. Hydrol. Process, 2008, 22, 1180–1188.
- Nakhaei, M. and Saberi Nasr, A., A combined wavelet-artificial neural network model and its application to the prediction of groundwater level fluctuations. J. Geope., 2012, 2(2), 77–91.
- Vetrivel. N. and Elangovan. K., Prediction and forecasting of groundwater level fluctuation by ANN technique. Int. J. Civil Eng. Technol., 2016, 7(5), 401–408.
- Rhif, M., Abbes, A. B., Farah, I. R., Martinez, B. and Sang, Y., Wavelet transform application for/in non-stationary time-series analysis: a review. Appl. Sci., 2019, 9, 1345.
- Zhou, H. C., Peng, Y. and Liang, G. H., The research of monthly discharge predictor-corrector model based on wavelet decomposition. Water Resour. Manage., 2008, 22, 217–227.
- Nourani, V. and Parhizkar, M., Conjunction of SOM-based feature extraction method and hybrid wavelet-ANN approach for rainfall– runoff modeling. J. Hydroinform., 2013, 15(3), 829–848.
- Grossmann, A. and Morlet, J., Decomposition of Hardy function into square integrable wavelets of constant shape. J. Math. Anal., 1984, 15(4), 723–736.
- Adamowski, J. and Sun, K., Development of a coupled wavelet transform and neural network method for flow forecasting of nonperennial rivers in semi-arid watersheds. J. Hydrol., 2010, 390 (1–2), 85–91.
- Kisi, O., Neural networks and wavelet conjunction model for intermittent stream-flow forecasting. J. Hydrol. Eng., 2009, 14(8), 773–782.
- Kisi, O., Neural network and wavelet conjunction model for modeling monthly level fluctuations in Turkey. Hydrol. Process., 2009, 23(14), 2081–2092.
- Nourani, V., Kisi, O. and Komasi, M., Two hybrid artificial intelligence approaches for modeling rainfall–runoff process. J. Hydrol., 2011, 402(1–2), 41–59.
- Maheswaran, R. and Khosa, R., Comparative study of different wavelets for hydrologic forecasting. Comput. Geosci., 2012, 46, 284–295.
- Maheswaran, R. and Khosa, R. Wavelet-Volterra coupled model for monthly stream flow forecasting. J. Hydrol., 2012, 450, 320–335.
- Sang, Y. F., A practical guide to discrete wavelet decomposition of hydrologic time series. Water Resour. Manage., 2012, 26(11), 3345–3365.
- Tiwari, M. K. and Chatterjee, C., A new wavelet-bootstrap-ANN hybrid model for daily discharge forecasting. J. Hydroinform., 2011, 13(3), 500–519.
- Bhabagrahi, S., Imtisenla, W., Bidyut, C. D. and Bhagwati, P. B., Standardization of reference evapotranspiration models for a sub humid valley rangeland in the Eastern Himalayas. J. Irrig. Drain Eng., 2012, 138, 880–895.
- Fausett, L., Fundamentals of Neural Networks, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.
- Maier, H. R. and Dandy, G. C., Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modeling issues and applications. Environ. Modell. Softw., 2000, 15, 101– 124.
- Anctil, F., Perrin, C. and Andreassian, V., Impact of the length of observed records on the performance of ANN and of conceptual parsimonious rainfall-runoff forecasting models. Environ. Modeling Software, 2004, 19(4), 357–368.
- Porter, D. W., Gibbs, P. G., Jones, W. F., Huyakorn, P. S., Hamm, L. L. and Flach, G. P., Data fusion modeling for groundwater systems. J. Contaminant Hydrol., 2000, 42, 303–335.
- Mallat, S., A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 1989, 11, 674–693.
- Cannas, B., Fanni, A., See, L. and Sias, G., Data pre-processing for river flow forecasting using neural networks: wavelet transforms and data partitioning. Phys. Chem. Earth., 2005, 31, 1164– 1171.
- Chandrasekhar, E., Dimri, V. P. and Gadre, V. M., Wavelets and Fractals in Earth System Sciences, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, UK, 2013.
- Nourani, V., Komasi, M. and Mano, A., A multivariate ANN Wavelet approach for rainfall-runoff modeling. Water Resour. Manage., 2009, 23, 2877–2894.